
The visual pun was irresistible: "The Muddy Bottom: more than just mud." I pulled out my Canon Elph and snapped a few photos with the exhibit sign in the foreground and the squatting, ass-crack-flashing employee in the background. This is how I became an accidental pornographer.
As much as I hate to admit it, I want a little fame. Just a smidgen. I get this fix by taking photos and uploading them to Flickr, tagging and organizing them with an eye towards maximum visibility. If I take a photo of the Golden Gate Bridge, I'll name it such, tag it with "Golden Gate Bridge", goldengatebridge, and ggb, then add it to as many Flickr groups associated with the famous span as possible. Each evening I eagerly scan my Stats and Recent Activity pages to see how times my photos were viewed and whether anyone has commented upon or "faved" them. Perhaps someone even added me as a Contact and will be notified of my future uploads! Oh boy!
The real buzz for me is when I take a photo that I feel is interesting to San Francisco locals: MUNI fiasco, parking travesties, fanboys camping outside the Apple store for days (really), or even beautiful city sunsets. For these I add the coveted "sfist" tag, whereupon my photo will automatically appear in the Contributor section of SFist.com, a hyper-local blog catering to the San Francisco scene. And if my photo is deemed worthy, the Deciders at the SFist will promote it to the home page or perhaps even label it the Photo du Jour (score!), a micro-validation of my wit and artistic ability. My stats will spike!
This 15-seconds-of-fame thinking ran though my mind at the California Academy of Sciences' "The Muddy Bottom" exhibit. The exhibit's purpose is to teach us how the mucky, nasty sea floor is teaming with life that is essential for a healthy ecosystem. Life as we know it depends upon the muddy bottom! Which is exactly what the low-rider wearing female employee was telling tourists as she squatted at the water's edge, displaying 5 full inches of crack and about half of her cheeks.
The Muddy Bottom. "More than just mud". Miles of butt-crack. My head exploded. My camera shutter snapped.
About one hour later I was distributing soft-core, though I didn't realize it at the time. You could not see the employee's face or any other distinguishing features (well, too me, anyway,) so I uploaded 3 crack-tastic photos to my Flickr account, tagged them "buttcrack sfist," and watched my view counts go up. And up. Several users added me to their Contacts and added those photos to their Faves; oh sweet, sweet popularity! Who were these appreciative viewers? I started checking out the people who doing the Contacts and Faves thing, and I kept getting the same warning:

So-and-so's photostream fall outside your current SafeSearch filter. You can click through to see them if you want.
What's this? This warning is presented to browsing users to prevent them from seeing something they might find offensive, such as adult-only content. Porn. What's up with that? It didn't take me long to figure out that the people who dug my snarky Muddy Bottom photos also hosted adult content their Flickr accounts.
Then struck me: I had become an accidental pornographer. Because of me, dudes with science-museum-employee-butt-crack fetishes might be... you know... doing stuff. I felt icky. Initially I changed the Safety Level of the photos from "Safe" to "Moderate," but then I realized that this was only reinforcing their unsavory nature. Was my photostream also outside most people's SafeSearch filter? Am I an "outside your current SafeSearch filter" kind of guy? No, no I'm not. The only decent thing to do was to delete the photos, which had been viewed over 400 times.
I can hear the rational part of my mind arguing that I didn't do anything wrong: the girl at the museum was flashing her ass around to hundreds of people; she cannot expect a right to privacy in a public place; she was an idiot for wearing those pants; more flesh is displayed on reality TV shows than what I photographed at that exhibit, not to mention Mardi Gras or any given day in Las Vegas. All valid arguments. But, for me, they do not stand up to the gut test. My gut says that I should not have uploaded those photos, and deleting them was the right thing to do. Yes, the photos are out there now, since anything that's on the Internet for a nanosecond is there forever, but I tried to hinder further distribution (even the word "distribution" sounds dirty.)
I feel that I have learned a lesson: sometimes it's hard to know where the line is between your own personal right and wrong unless you cross it. I crossed my line because I desired to seen as witty, artistic, and even a little Internet famous. I'm better than that. I'll use better judgment from now on. Sure, I'll sill bait the SFist, but not at the expense of others, even if they don't know it.